ICES2003 Paper Review Form

For your convenience, this page also exists as a printable PDF-document here.

Deadline: Friday, October 11, 2002

All printing should be done before submitting the review. Once the review is submitted, the access to the review is closed.

In each of the sub-categories below please choose one option and include your own comments particularly if you are giving a low rating. This will help the authors, now or in the future, to improve their work.


Your E-Mail:

Paper ID (Paper number only):

Paper Title (truncated):

Password:


A) Paper content and originality


1. How relevant is this paper with regards to the field evolvable systems?

Very relevant

Relevant

Of passing interest

Not relevant

Comments:


2. Is the paper technically correct?

Yes

Appears to be, but limited information available

Only partly

No

Comments:


3. What contribution does the paper make to the state-of-the-art?

A major original contribution

Some originality in the work

Little originality present

None

Comments:


4. Nature of the paper

Original research

Mostly survey

Description of an application

Comments:


5. What is the status of the work?

Finished (though possibly suggesting further work)

Under progress with interesting partial results

Idea for a project

Comments:


B) Presentation


1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?

Excellent

Good, a few minor changes needed (see comments)

Satisfactory, more major changes required before publishable (see comments)

Poor, unredeemable

Comments:


2. Is the English and clarity of the paper acceptable? (You might consider here the abstract, introduction, readability of the paper.)

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

Comments:


3. Is the bibliography

Complete

Satisfactory, but some additions recommended

Poor

Comments:


C) Recommendation for the program chairs


Definitely accept

Probably accept (see comments)

Probably reject (see comments)

Definitely reject

Comments:


D) Level of confidence of the referee regarding the field of the paper. (On a scale 0-10, 10 an expert, 0 know nothing of this area.)


E) Suggestions to the author(s) for improving the paper:


F) Other comments


Thank you very much for your much valued time and trouble.

ICES'03 home page

If you have problems please contact the webmaster